Rhun son of Urien
Rhun
(also spelled Run, Rum) was a son of the warrior-king Urien of Rheged (see post
on Urien Rheged). Unlike the more famous Owain son of Urien
(see post on Owain son of Urien)
, Rhun did not become a hero of medieval Arthurian romance. He is mentioned in Historia Brittonum and Annales
Cambriae as an important churchman. What can we say about him?
Evidence
Genealogies
Both
the Harleian and the Bonedd Gwyr y Gogledd (Descent of the Men of the North)
genealogies end with Urien and do not mention any descendants:
[U]rbgen map Cinmarc map Merchianum map Gurgust map Coilhen
--Harleian
Genealogies, available online
Vryen uab Kynuarch m Meirchavn m Gorust Letlvm m Keneu m Coel
--Bonedd
Gwyr y Gogledd, available online
Historia Brittonum
The following Easter Edwin himself received baptism, and twelve thousand of his subjects with him. If any one wishes to know who baptized them, it was Rum Map Urbgen: he was engaged forty days in baptizing all classes of the Saxons, and by his preaching many believed on Christ.
--Historia
Brittonum, chapter 63, available online
Urbgen
is the spelling of Urien used in the Harleian genealogies. Rum (also spelled
Rhun) son of Urien was presumably a churchman, if he was engaged in baptism and
preaching.
Readers
familiar with Bede will have spotted that Bede gives a different account of Edwin/Eadwine’s
baptism. More on this in another post.
The
Chartres manuscript of Historia Brittonum says in its preface that the compiler
used as a source ‘excerpts made by the son of Urien from the Book of St
Germanus’ (Clarkson 2010, p 120). Rum or Rhun is the only son of Urien
mentioned in the text of Historia Brittonum, so presumably this comment refers
to him.
Annales Cambriae
626 Edwin is baptized, and Rhun son of Urien baptized him
--Annales
Cambriae, available online
This
entry agrees with the statement in Historia Brittonum. The date differs from
that given in Bede, who says that the baptism took place in 627 (Book II, Ch. 14).
It may be that the compiler of Annales Cambriae copied the information from
Historia Brittonum (or vice versa), or that both were drawing on material about
Eadwine’s baptism that was not available to, or not used by, Bede.
Llywarch Hen poetry
The medieval
manuscript ‘The Red Book of Hergest’ contains several poems attributed to
Llywarch Hen (Llywarch the Old).
According to the genealogies, Llywarch was a cousin and approximate
contemporary or Urien, and the poem ‘The Death of Urien’ describes Llywarch
carrying Urien’s severed head after Urien had been assassinated. The poem also mentions warfare in the
aftermath of Urien’s death:
On Friday I saw great anxiety
Among the hosts of Baptism,
Like a swarm without a hive, bold in despair.
Were there not given to me by Run, greatly fond of war,
A hundred swarms and a hundred shields ?
But one swarm was better far than all.
Were there not given to me by Run, the famous chief,
A cantrev, and a hundred oxen?
But one gift was better far than those.
In the lifetime of Run, the peaceless ranger,
The unjust will wallow in dangers;
May there be irons on the steeds of rapine.
--Llywarch
Hen, The Death of Urien, translation available online
This
passage is followed by a stanza describing attacks on Owain, the son of
Urien celebrated in the Taliesin poetry (see post on Owain son of Urien),
so it seems likely that Run is also to be understood as a son of Urien, facing
enemies after Urien’s death.
Triads
Three
Fair Womb Burdens of the Island of Britain:
The second, Owain and Morfudd daughter of Urien and Anarun archbishop of Llydaw, by Modron daughter of Afallach their mother
-- Welsh
Triads, available online
‘Anarun
archbishop of Llydaw’ could be a reference to Rum or Rhun ap Urien, who appears
as a churchman in Historia Brittonum and Annales Cambriae. ‘Llydaw’ is the Welsh name for Brittany. However, an alternative variation of the same
Triad mentions only Owain and Morfudd, without ‘Anarun’, so he may be a late
addition.
Interpretation
Role
Two
sources refer to Rhun in contexts that associate him with the Christian church:
- Historia Brittonum and Annales Cambriae say that he conducted a high-profile baptism;
- Historia Brittonum says he preached Christianity and made many converts;
- The preface of the Chartres manuscript of Historia Brittonum says that it includes extracts made by the son of Urien from the Book of St Germanus.
The consistency
between the two sources may indicate no more than copying from each other
during the centuries between the events of the late sixth and early seventh
century and the final writing of the medieval manuscripts in which both sources
have come down to us. Or it may indicate that both were drawing on information
preserved in other sources about Rhun’s career.
In
addition, one of the Triads refers to a son of Urien (brother of Owain and
Morfudd) called ‘Anarun archbishop of Llydaw’.
‘Anarun’ may be a variant of Rhun or Rum, and describing him as
‘archbishop’ is also consistent with the idea that he was considered to be an
important figure in the Christian church. However, ‘Llydaw’ is the Welsh name
for Brittany, a curious (although not impossible) location for the son of a
north British king. Furthermore, an alternative variation of the same Triad
refers only to Morfudd and Owain, without mentioning ‘Anarun’, so I would be
cautious about this Triad. If ‘Anarun’
is intended to be the same figure as the Rhun/Rum mentioned in Historia
Brittonum, it is consistent with Rhun having been a churchman of some
importance, but I would not put too much weight on it.
Although
‘the son of Urien’ referred to in the preface to the Chartres manuscript is not
named, the only son of Urien referred to in the text is Rhun, suggesting that
the preface also refers to Rhun. If so,
it would indicate that he was a scholar, which is also consistent with his
having been a churchman.
The
poem attributed to Llywarch Hen apparently portrays Rhun in the role of a
warrior and ruler, describing him as ‘peaceless ranger’ and ‘the famous
chief’. This is not necessarily
inconsistent with Rhun having also had a position in the Christian church.
Sigeberht of East Anglia retired to a monastery after he had reigned for a
while, and was later recalled for an important battle (Bede Book III Ch. 18). Aldfrith,
who became king of Northumbria after Ecgfrith’s death in 685, was also a
religious scholar, described by Bede as ‘well-read in the Scriptures’ (Book IV Ch.
26). Gildas says that Maglocunus
(usually identified as Maelgwn of Gwynedd) had entered a monastery for a while
before renouncing his vows and becoming king.
Rhun may
also have been both secular ruler and churchman at different times in his
life. Perhaps, like Aldfrith, he was a
churchman who was pressed into service at a time of crisis; or perhaps he
sought an alternative career in the church after Urien’s death.
The
account of Eadwine’s baptism differs from that given by Bede (more on this
issue in another post).
Family
Assuming
that Rhun son of Urien is also the Rhun named as grandfather of Rhianmellth in
Historia Brittonum, Rhun fathered at least one child. This is also not inconsistent with his having
held an important position in the church.
If he entered the church late in life, he may have married and
established a family before entering the church. Also, although monks were not
permitted to marry, other Christian clergy in post-Roman Britain were allowed
to marry and raise families; St Patrick says in his Confessio that his father was a deacon and his grandfather was a
priest.
More
on Rhianmellth in a later post.
Age
The
Llywarch Hen poetry portrays Run as a chieftain and fighter in the aftermath of
Urien’s death, implying that he was of fighting age when Urien was killed. The date of Urien’s death is not known,
although as Urien was fighting the sons of Ida at the time, it presumably
occurred before Ida’s grandson Aethelferth became king of Bernicia in 593.
If
Rhun was involved in the baptism of Eadwine of Deira/Northumbria in 627, he
must have been an adult at the time. As this was a high-profile event and would
presumably have been conducted by someone senior, he was probably well into
middle age.
This
is consistent with a birth date for Rhun somewhere in the third quarter of the sixth
century. He cannot have been born much before 550, as otherwise he would have
been too old to participate in Eadwine’s baptism in 627 (if he was born in,
say, 550, Rhun would have been 77 at the time of Eadwine’s baptism, which would
make him a venerable figure but not necessarily too old to take part in a
religious ceremony). At the other end of
the range, if Urien’s death occurred close to 593, Rhun would have had to have
been born no later than about 578 to be of fighting age by then (if he was born
in, say, 578, he would be 15 in 593). If
Urien’s death was earlier, Rhun’s latest plausible birth date would be
correspondingly earlier.
It is
not known when or how Rhun died.
Conclusion
It
seems clear that Rhun son of Urien was considered to have been an important
churchman in the early seventh century.
The Llywarch Hen poem implies that he was also a secular ruler and
warrior. He may have held both roles at
different times in his life.
It is
not known what position Rhun held in the Christian church. If the ‘Anarun
archbishop of Llydaw’ in the Triad refers to Rhun, it may indicate that he held
a senior position. This would also be
consistent with his involvement in a high-profile baptism ceremony, and with
his status as a member of a royal dynasty. He may have been a bishop. Depending on his age and when he embarked on
his clerical career, he could perhaps have been one of the bishops or ‘learned
men’ who attended the Synod at Chester in the early seventh century (see
earlier post A bishop of Chester? for more information on the synod).
The
Llywarch Hen poetry suggests that Rhun was a ruler and warrior in the aftermath
of Urien’s death. Whether he was a king of Rheged, and if so, whether he ruled
jointly with one or more of Urien’s other sons, is not known. The political status of Rheged after Urien’s
death is uncertain. It may be
significant that the genealogies stop at Urien, which may indicate that he was
considered the last significant ruler. Conversely, it may indicate that they
were compiled in Urien’s time and not subsequently updated to reflect his
descendants. If Rhianmellth was Rhun’s grand-daughter, her marriage to Oswy of
Northumbria suggests that the Rheged dynasty still retained a high status in
the early seventh century, and may also have retained at least some political
and military power.
References
Annales
Cambriae, available online
Bede.
Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Translated by Leo Sherley-Price, Penguin
Classics, 1968, ISBN 0-14-044565-X
Bonedd
Gwyr y Gogledd, available online
Clarkson
T. The Men of the North. Birlinn, 2010. ISBN 978-1-906566-18-0.
Gildas,
On the Ruin and Conquest of Britain, available online
Harleian
genealogies, available online
Historia
Brittonum, available online
Llywarch
Hen, The Death of Urien, available online
St
Patrick, Confessio, available online
Welsh
Triads, available online
8 comments:
Thanks for including the poetry links. I always like to read those. Can't go wrong with a poem that talks about 'Llywarch carrying Urien’s severed head'. :)
Constance - hope you enjoy the poetry links. The same site has the poems in the original language as well as the translations.
I think the original language is a bit beyond me at this point. I may be able to puzzle out some Italian, German, and even some Latin, but Welsh? :)
Quite - I can recognise a few words, but not enough to get very far! I was thinking that as a poet you might be able to pick up some of the rhythms of the original, and that those might be of interest to you.
Catching up late ...
The account of Eadwine’s baptism differs from that given by Bede (more on this issue in another post).
The one-year discrepancy doesn't strike me as a big deal - in the absence of an agreed-on epoch, dating anything would be a pain. (Which helps explain why Bede would encourage AD dating.)
But Urien's son, no less, presiding at an English royal baptism, and/or making 'many converts', goes against the stereotype - owed largely to Bede, I'd imagine - that the native British church mostly sat on its hands about christianizing the English.
Which I imagine is why there will be more on this in an upcoming post.
Rick - the difference is more than the one-year discrepancy in the date. Annales Cambriae and Bede often differ by a year or a few years in the dates they give for the same event (there are some examples in my post on Dating the Battle of Chester). It's easy to see how this sort of minor discrepancy would arise when dealing with records in regnal years, or by miscopying the wrong line in a book of Easter tables, and it is probably no big deal.
Completely agree on the dates. I'll be interested to hear more about the other differences between the Annales Cambriae account and Bede ...
I'll put up a post about it when I have time (probably next month some time).
Post a Comment